About Andrew Dubber

Andrew Dubber is Professor of Music Industries Innovation at Birmingham School of Media.

Ten years of iTunes retail

The metaphors we adopt and discard are important when it comes to understanding how we make sense of the environment of the internet. Remember when we used to ‘surf the information superhighway’? Thankfully now we just sit at our computers and ‘use’ websites, or are, at the very most, ‘on’ them. “Do you use Facebook?” “Are you on Twitter?” “Did you see that on YouTube?” “I don’t use LinkedIn (but they still keep sending me emails every day).”

And yet spatial and transportation metaphors abound when it comes to online retail. If we want to buy a book, we ‘go to’ Amazon. Websites ‘take you to’ their store. Email sales messages ask us to ‘visit’ so that we can buy stuff.

Breaking that spatial metaphor is the key central innovation of the iTunes Store (the iTunes Music Store when it launched, but they’ve diversified). Yes, you’re still paying money online and downloading music from the internet in exchange for that money paid – but you do not go anywhere to do so. The store is on your desktop. It’s right here. Part of the player.

“Shall I go download it from Amazon?”
“No need, I can get it right here on iTunes.”

Fundamentally the transaction and the mechanics of the process are virtually indistinguishable – except for two important things. First, you had to ‘navigate’ to a website. And second, if you download the music from “elsewhere”, you still then have to import the music into iTunes, if that’s your music player (and it is most people’s).

It’s no wonder that the iTunes store is so phenomenally successful. I can not only buy music without leaving my house – I can buy music without leaving my music player. Faced with that kind of simplicity and the frictionless purchasing that results from having an iTunes account already tied to your credit card, the miracle is that it’s not more successful than it is.

Say what you like about them – but we appear to like shopping malls, as a culture. Having a device that enables us to visit those shopping malls from the comfort of our home feels like progress to us. What Apple have done with the iTunes store is to remove the need to visit. The shopping mall is now right here, right now.

Of course, they’ve made some pretty good self sabotage attempts by deliberately breaking their products (restrictive digital rights management), stocking low-quality goods (insisting on low-resolution files – though AAC is measurably better than mp3 encoded at the same low rate), and moving all the shelves around so we can’t find what we want (some appalling user interface decisions on certain upgrade versions) – but even so, on the whole, it seems like the one thing Apple simply cannot get wrong no matter how hard they try.

The overarching logic and design of the iTunes store has had some unintended consequences for music retail: the predominance of the individual track over the album sale. The characteristics of the environment and the deliberate removing of all points of purchasing friction has led to the musical equivalent of grabbing a candy bar because it happens to be right there.

“How did that song go? Oh wait – I have iTunes open – I’ll just grab it.”

To suggest that iTunes has been a positive or negative force for the Music Industry is to first believe that there’s such a thing (I don’t happen to) and second to believe that it matters (likewise). The iTunes Store is not something that happened to the music industries, the software application industries, the magazine, film, book and television industries – but instead represent a (now rather established and settled) shift in the context within which those industries operate.

And now it’s been here for ten years. Normalised. Embedded in the culture with a range of accessories, gadgets and devices that require that we use that same environment, and for which we can, without effort or pause for reflection, simply purchase new sounds, activities, and entertainments.

Not only that, but the ease of use and seamless, convenient integration also drives the hardware sales which, of course, is where the real margins lie. If it wasn’t quite so profitable and popular, you’d almost be forced to conclude that music was nothing more than the bait in this setup.

But ten years is three lifetimes in internet years. A measure of something which, almost like email, is so seamlessly integrated into our daily lives that for it to suddenly go away would be unthinkable.

It turns out we quite like having a shopping mall on our laps.

Inaugural professorial blog post

It’s traditional, when one becomes a professor, to give an inaugural lecture that explains your research and, hopefully, demonstrates your professorial qualities amongst your peers and to a wider audience. It’s a celebration and an initiation ceremony all rolled into one.

As I’ve just become a professor, this honour and/or ordeal awaits me, though I believe I am being spared until such time as we move into the new building, which will be after the summer break.

In the meantime, a blog post will have to do.

I have just returned from a research sabbatical, during which time I finished and submitted my book Radio in the Digital Age, which will be published by Polity later this year, and I also received the first copies of my co-authored text book Understanding the Music Industries, published by Sage. I’ve been travelling a great deal as well, and in LA, I have been interested to learn more about the inner workings of the sync licensing industry – that is, the people who put songs into movies, games and TV shows. What’s fascinating about that to me is the significant proportion of lesser known independent artists that make good money that way – and the extent to which a piece of music is considered ‘licensable’ or not based on a number of factors, not all of which have to do with the sonic qualities or songwriting style of the work.

In addition, I’ve started work on a documentary project collaboration with local filmmakers Blue Hippo, who made the excellent Last Shop Standing. The documentary comes out of my research into Fora do Eixo – the network of independent music collectives in Brazil who are achieving significant economic and cultural outcomes outside of what might ordinarily be considered the traditional music industries. In fact, they’ve grown to the point now where they have their own currency, their own university, their own bank and their own political party. Far more than a group of people who put on gigs around the country, Fora do Eixo have become a social movement to be reckoned with – and that’s the subject of the film. I’ll be spending a few weeks travelling across Brazil doing the interviews in July and August.

In the meantime, I’m returning to the teaching, catching up with my MA students, and will be presenting at a couple of academic conferences over the next few weeks. I also have a couple of research proposals in the works. More on those soon.

As far as the sabbatical goes – it was lovely to be away, but it’s nice to be back. And with a new job title too. I wonder if I’ll get business cards this time…?

How National Jazz Agencies use the internet

Computer

As part of my involvement with the Rhythm Changes project, I’ve been doing some research into the ways in which different national jazz agencies around Europe use the internet as part of what they do.

At the 2011 Jazzahead conference, I interviewed delegates representing music centres and national jazz agencies from the UK, Netherlands, Slovenia, Iceland, France, Hungary, Finland, Estonia, Catalonia, Denmark, Belgium, Norway and Sweden. From those interviews, I was able to discern a number of shared concerns, overlapping strategies and common goals and approaches that these organisations have used to think about their online offerings.

While each national agency is essentially interested in the promotion and propagation of the jazz music of their own country, this basic commonality of intent is not uniformly reflected in the strategies each brings to the Internet in order to achieve that aim. In fact, in many ways, the approaches differ substantially. In part, this is attributable to the various differences in the cultural, economic and political objectives that underpin the activities of these organisations, but it also reflects differences in audience demographic profiles, access to financial, technical and human resources to develop the online offerings and the levels of online experience (and interest) staff members of the organisation possess.

Continue reading

Posted in Rhythm Changes | Tagged internet, jazz | Leave a reply

Dave Harte interviews Noha Atef

Dave Harte, leader of our MA in Social Media talks to new international student Noha Atef, who runs the website Torture In Egypt.

Research presentation: Pete Wilby

Pete Wilby discusses the problem of being a fan/participant observer. From the Centre for Media and Cultural Research weekly research seminar.

Social Media Reversals

At work in Groningen
Ard at work: Ard Boer (left), New Music Labs, Groningen

Last week, I spoke here about attempts towards a formula for measuring social media engagement about a music artist on Twitter. That was one of the conversations I had with New Music Labs founder Ard Boer, whose Tribemonitor service tracks social media and online metrics for artists and labels.

I’ve been working on a small, IDEA-funded Knowledge Transfer project with New Music Labs to help think through new ideas and approaches for Tribemonitor.

Ard and I spoke at length about the idea of innovative strategies for independent artists in the social media space. At present, a default approach appears to be to do whatever it takes to get followed and increase your audience size.

Artists will encourage their fans to ‘Add me on Facebook, Follow me on Twitter, Sign up to my email list, Friend me on MySpace, Subscribe to my RSS feed, Go to my blog…’ and so on. The idea behind this strategy is that the artist can then continue to develop their fanbase as a discrete number of people, and communicate with them (broadcast to them) on a regular basis.

However, a reflective discussion with Ard about the realities and psychology at work within the social media space suggest that an alternative strategy can be identified. It’s one that has a potential to use the medium more effectively, and around which an innovative business development can be formed.

And that’s to turn the process inside out.

Continue reading

Measuring popularity in online music: social media, maths & the influence of fans


Photo by raygunb

I’ve just been in Groningen in the Netherlands to brainstorm and research Tribemonitor – an online information service to artists and record labels, created by New Music Labs.

The purpose of Tribemonitor is to measure the popularity of music artists based on social media buzz across a range of platforms, rather than on sales or radio airplay.

Measuring online buzz is not a simple thing to do, however. There are some scrapable and publicly accessible pieces of information such as Last.FM plays or numbers of MySpace friends that are obvious and countable. These simple statistical measures that make a good starting point that can act as a basis for artist consultancy (or reassurance): number of MySpace plays, number of artist followers on Twitter, number of YouTube views, etc.

But these metrics only measure what could be described as fan activity, rather than a useful and measurable social score, which would have more to do with the extent to which that artist is being discussed outside of their own sphere of influence. And this is the reason for this intervention.

Continue reading

Fight the Power: The Art of Protest and the Theory of Social Objects


The question isn’t “what is this picture about?” or even “what does it mean to you?” – but “given this picture, what shall we talk about?”

I’ve been working recently with Punch Records in Birmingham in a Knowledge Transfer capacity, to explore some theories about online and social media, and apply them to their music and arts activities.

I’m interested in the ways in which people use media online as “social objects” – that is, to take those objects and use them as the occasion for online conversation. And in doing so, people seem to make sense of those objects (whether they’re images, video or music) and recontextualise them in the service of whatever stories or conversations they’re trying to communicate.

One of the interesting things that Punch has been focused on recently, and launched last night at the Custard Factory here in BIrmingham, is an exhibition called , which presents images and posters of protest and propaganda. And one of the interesting things about the exhibition is that it’s designed to be experiential, rather than simply a display that you can quietly and passively consume.

Continue reading

Research, public debate and online music

Nick Webber’s MeCCSA 2010 conference presentation at the London School of Economics, regarding the effect and veracity of existing research on the public debate around digital music consumption.