<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Empowering Public Sector Workers with Social Media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://interactivecultures.org/social-media/empowering-public-sector-workers-with-social-media/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://interactivecultures.org/social-media/empowering-public-sector-workers-with-social-media</link>
	<description>research. knowledge transfer. consultancy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 08:25:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Heaven</title>
		<link>http://interactivecultures.org/social-media/empowering-public-sector-workers-with-social-media/comment-page-1#comment-604</link>
		<dc:creator>John Heaven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 00:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://interactivecultures.org/?p=1154#comment-604</guid>
		<description>I agree that research is an important part of persuading people to adopt new ways of working, but perhaps those who need research before even trying social media aren&#039;t those who will lead the revolution. In a way, waiting for the research is either an excuse, or the kind of defensive practice that is part of the wider issue around local government and openness. Speaking in a personal capacity here, I&#039;m probably in some instances as bad as the rest; but ideally, an enthusiastic worker keen to do their job well would experiment with social media in case it can assist them. I do actually know of cases of this.

Another point about the blurring boundary between personal and private life: I was thinking the other day that it would be nice to have separate brains for work and pleasure, in the same way that I have two mobiles. Unfortunately, I&#039;m not one of those people that do, and I often find myself creating a mental to-do list, or solving work problems when I should be sleeping.

The point is that those that want to will ensure they avoid seepage -- which is fine, by the way, and I don&#039;t think anybody should be pressured to use personal social media profiles for work stuff -- but others, by their nature, won&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that research is an important part of persuading people to adopt new ways of working, but perhaps those who need research before even trying social media aren&#8217;t those who will lead the revolution. In a way, waiting for the research is either an excuse, or the kind of defensive practice that is part of the wider issue around local government and openness. Speaking in a personal capacity here, I&#8217;m probably in some instances as bad as the rest; but ideally, an enthusiastic worker keen to do their job well would experiment with social media in case it can assist them. I do actually know of cases of this.</p>
<p>Another point about the blurring boundary between personal and private life: I was thinking the other day that it would be nice to have separate brains for work and pleasure, in the same way that I have two mobiles. Unfortunately, I&#8217;m not one of those people that do, and I often find myself creating a mental to-do list, or solving work problems when I should be sleeping.</p>
<p>The point is that those that want to will ensure they avoid seepage &#8212; which is fine, by the way, and I don&#8217;t think anybody should be pressured to use personal social media profiles for work stuff &#8212; but others, by their nature, won&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
