Social Media Reversals

At work in Groningen
Ard at work: Ard Boer (left), New Music Labs, Groningen

Last week, I spoke here about attempts towards a formula for measuring social media engagement about a music artist on Twitter. That was one of the conversations I had with New Music Labs founder Ard Boer, whose Tribemonitor service tracks social media and online metrics for artists and labels.

I’ve been working on a small, IDEA-funded Knowledge Transfer project with New Music Labs to help think through new ideas and approaches for Tribemonitor.

Ard and I spoke at length about the idea of innovative strategies for independent artists in the social media space. At present, a default approach appears to be to do whatever it takes to get followed and increase your audience size.

Artists will encourage their fans to ‘Add me on Facebook, Follow me on Twitter, Sign up to my email list, Friend me on MySpace, Subscribe to my RSS feed, Go to my blog…’ and so on. The idea behind this strategy is that the artist can then continue to develop their fanbase as a discrete number of people, and communicate with them (broadcast to them) on a regular basis.

However, a reflective discussion with Ard about the realities and psychology at work within the social media space suggest that an alternative strategy can be identified. It’s one that has a potential to use the medium more effectively, and around which an innovative business development can be formed.

And that’s to turn the process inside out.

Following your fans
The degree of success to which an individual or organisation uses social media is not proportionate to the number of people to whom they manage to broadcast. As we touched upon in the social media algorithm experiment, it’s important to consider the degree of engagement, and the ‘interestingness’ of the artist – not simply the broadcast-era formula of ‘reach and frequency’ by which advertising success is measured.

As a result, a two-way, reflective and responsive approach is needed. Collecting people who will sign up to your mailing list, or add your Twitter feed to their ever-expanding stream of social media noise is not sufficient. It’s important to listen more than it is to talk.

As a result of these discussions, we proposed a hypothetical ‘inside out’ artist signup page. When you discover an artist and decide that you like their music, you go to a page where you add your own social media information.

My Twitter name:
My Facebook page:
My MySpace:
My Flickr account:
My YouTube:

and so on.

By volunteering this information, it’s possible for the artist to learn what is of interest, and how to connect directly with the fan.

Of course, with any significant numbers of fans, the role of the entrepreneurial innovator is to aggregate the information and provide meaningful data to the artist or label. For instance:

“A lot of your fans are also interested in motorsports. I know that you’re interested in motorsports. Perhaps this is a topic you could talk about on your own Twitter profile or engage with to strengthen the fan connection…”

“These fans took photos at Glastonbury festival last year. You’re playing at Glastonbury this year. Why not comment on their Flickr stream and ask if they’re coming to see you this time around?”

“This fan has been raving about your music on Facebook to their 500 friends. You should leave them a comment or send them a free track…”

And so on. The opportunity to do textual and content analysis to spot trends and identify shared areas of interest amongst your fans is only possible if you consider the social media environment as a conversational space, rather than as a broadcast medium.

This is not to say that building an ever-larger fanbase is not a helpful strategy for independent music promotion – but that thinking of that only in terms of a numbers game leads to the kind of strategy that automatically adds friends on MySpace whether or not they like (or have even heard) the music.

A smaller number of engaged and interested people is worth far more than a large number of people who are either disinterested in or actively annoyed by your communication.

By listening more than talking, an artist’s social media interaction has the opportunity to be far more engaged and responsive – and in order to facilitate this, there lies the potential for an online service (or what we conceived of as an additional aspect of Tribemonitor) to provide the opt-in signup facility, as well as the data analysis and interpretation that will inform conversational media strategy for the artist.


Obviously, these principles do not simply apply to music fandom, but can be applied equally to businesses and communities of all kinds. It’s possible to extrapolate broader principles and methodologies from this discussion – but my focus was on being helpful to Tribemonitor, whose focus is on music artists and record labels.

I’m grateful to Ard for the permission to discuss here in public what some might consider to be commercially sensitive information (Tribemonitor plan to build such a service, but have not as yet done so). However, Ard is keen to hear open discussion on the ideas around strategy. New Music Labs’ expertise with respect to this service is more in the area of interpretation, analysis – and the consultancy that can come out of this sort of market intelligence.

3 thoughts on “Social Media Reversals

  1. The principles in this article are ones that should be followed by everyone, in the context of social media or otherwise.

    “By listening more than talking, an artist’s social media interaction has the opportunity to be far more engaged and responsive.”

    However, I wonder how willing fans and potential fans will be to volunteer that information in an age where getting someone to sign up for a band’s mailing list can be like pulling teeth!

    Even though you contrast this approach with the ‘Follow me on Twitter, Like me on Facebook, sign up for my mailing list!’ approach, they both share one common theme – the fan needs to opt in by volunteering personal contact information. In fact, what you are suggesting requires MORE personal information to be shared than before.

    Nevertheless, I completely agree that a much deeper engagement can be cultivated with the fans that DO opt in if the artist is willing to spend the time to listen and respond rather than simply broadcast.

  2. The listening component cannot be sold enough as it is so underused. There is a reason why the companies that develop the social media monitoring tools can command so much money for them, as those that understand the value see it as a great benefit. Great post, Mr. Dubber. You have a new reader in me.

  3. I agree with some of refe’s points, and on top of that; there are some other barriers here -

    You mention connecting with fans on Facebook, but is that really appropriate for all artists with personal profiles? plus, profiles are capped at 5,000 fans, what happens when/if you reach that level and can’t add any more? you then face the challenge of migrating all those fans to a ‘page’

    More to the point on Facebook, ‘Pages’ are amazing places to discover what your fans want and talk to them.. there are discussion forums, the wall its self, and all the comments on every update you make. Yes, it can be used as a ‘broadcast’ channel, but you can make it an engaging channel by commenting back to users, talking on discussion boards and replying to fan’s wall posts.. and even better, other fans can see you talking back and it creates more discussion and value in the page. That’s where the value lies with getting fans to ‘Like’ your page.

    In terms of Twitter, the whole approach to get fans following you is to be able to follow them back and talk, so its still plausible to get people to follow you, it increases communication opportunities.

    With Myspace i honestly dont believe in it enough to comment, and although RSS is a broadcast tool, there’s nothing wrong with that; as that’s how its designed and thats how people want to consume.

    My main point here being you need fans to ‘follow’ or ‘like’ you etc, because from that you open the doors to real engagement; its up to artists individually if they choose to just ‘broadcast’ in those situations or adopt a more dialogue based approach where they’ll get real value.

    And to touch on e-mail; with open rates floating around 20%, how much value will someone really get out of that? Users are more comfortable talking in a social space with relative ‘strangers’ more than anything, so that’s where it should happen.

    When it comes to learning more about your fans i think there are better ways of doing this, Social Graph has opened so many possibilities, and im personally under way developing apps to highlight interest areas in fans to enrich artist relations.

    anyway, thanks for posting; love to the Dubber

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>